Copyright subsists in Cinematograph film as an original work: Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court has held that in a suit for Copyright infringement of a Cinematograph film, the infringing copy need not be an exact copy of the Cinematograph film, made by a process of duplication or a substantial/material copy.
It has opined that the blatant copying of fundamental/essential/distinctive features of a Cinematograph film on purpose would amount to copyright infringement.
Consequently, it held that the scope of protection of a film was at par with other original works and the test laid down in Supreme Court’s decision in RG Anand v. M/s Deluxe Films and Ors. (1978) would apply.
The judgment was passed by a Single Judge Bench of Justice Manmohan in a plea by MRF Tyres (plaintiff) against Metro Tyres (defendant).Previous Post Next Post
- 162 intellectual property violations reported in Saudi Arabia
- Brainbase Raises $3M Led by Struck Capital to Launch Intellectual Property Licensing Platform
- DOAR Launches Intellectual Property Consulting Practice
- Copyright subsists in Cinematograph film as an original work: Delhi High Court
- Lazada leverages Alibaba’s IP protection platform